About












Fig. 1  Book cover of Thinking Design - Blueprint for an Architecture of Typology, Zurich: Park Books 2021.



Fig. 2 Plans of 144 projects featured in Thinking Design - Blueprint for an Architecture of Typology drawn at the same scale encompassing theater, museum, library, state, office, recreation, religion, retail, factory, education, surveillance, and hospital structures.  




Fig. 3 Page spread of category “retail” with plans at same scale, building types and key literatures. 



Fig. 4 Aldo Rossi’s “Teatro del Mondo” with plan, section, and axonometric drawings plus a brief text describing central aspects of the composition. 



Fig. 5 “Counterintuitive Typologies” is the title of an enclosed booklet with 12 supervised Master’s theses that is published as a supplement to Thinking Design: Blueprint for an Architecture of Typology.



Fig. 6 Page Spreads from booklet “Counterintuitive Typologies” with twelve master’s theses supervised by Andreas Lechner at TU Graz between 2015 and 2021.



Fig. 7 Extract from Alexander Gebetsroither’s diploma thesis I-710/I-105 #more than infrastructure on a Los Angeles highway interjunction from 2016. This thesis was awarded Archiprix world’s best graduate thesis in 2017.



Andreas Lechner’s research and teaching at the Faculty of Architecture at Graz University of Technology focuses on the theme of Counterintuitive Typologies. This research group involves international collaborations, design studios, electives, master’s theses, PhD research, and a three-year project funded by the Austrian Science Promotion Agency (FFG).

The initiative responds to contemporary architectural challenges, particularly by engaging with concepts of upcycling and adaptive reuse, while simultaneously re-examining the notion of "type" in architecture.
Through this lens, Counterintuitive Typologies seeks to critically revisit and update architectural epistemology, positioning architecture as a key medium for navigating the tensions between cultural relevance and the material imperatives of circularity. In a field often overshadowed by the methodologies of the natural and social sciences, engineering, or the fine arts, architecture emerges here as uniquely situated to explore and reveal the aesthetic potential of the environmental turn—an understanding not easily assumed nor merely derivative.
 
Lechner’s concept of Counterintuitive Typologies addresses the multiple contradictions and temporalities of contemporary architectural practice, recalibrating its agencies and expanding its agendas. This endeavor is framed around the tension between established typological models and emergent needs arising from global environmental, social, and technological challenges. The exploration of such tensions forms the basis of Lechner’s research and educational focus, and exemplifies how architecture can simultaneously engage with material life while remaining attentive to epistemological and cultural discourses.

The launch of Counterintuitive Typologies coincided with the preparation of the second German and first English edition of Lechner’s Thinking Design – Blueprint for an Architecture of Typologies (Park Books, 2021) [fig. 1-8]. This text draws on Aldo Rossi’s interpretation of the city as a composition of monuments, traces, and collective memory. Lechner expands upon Rossi’s ideas by reinterpreting typology through contemporary concerns, presenting 144 significant buildings (fig. 2) from antiquity to the 21st century in three chapters: Tectonics, Type, and Topos. The book examines twelve civic typologies, each illustrated through a set of examples drawn in plans, sections, and axonometric views, occasionally supplemented by key elevations (fig. 4).

A booklet accompanying the text applies these typological approaches to interpret the peripheries of urban environments, commercial vernaculars, and city edges (fig. 5). These design projects, derived from master’s theses under Lechner’s supervision (2015–2021), challenge conventional typologies by asking what future monuments the periphery will leave behind (fig. 6, 7). In this way, they explore the question of architecture’s role in engaging with peripheral conditions as a key aspect of the discipline's subject matter.

Ultimately, Counterintuitive Typologies aims to develop an architecture that is both materially responsive and culturally engaged. It seeks to reconcile architecture’s disciplinary autonomy with the contingencies of contemporary life, thereby rethinking the role of typology and analogical reasoning. This approach challenges the notion of the architectural work as a self-contained, autonomous object, emphasizing instead the fluid interplay between cultural production, materiality, and the broader socio-political and environmental contexts in which architecture operates.



Team


Andreas Lechner
(PI, Associate Professor)

Maike Gold
(Project Assistant & PhD candidate)

Stefan Hochhofer
(TU Graz, student assistant)

Laura Suvieri
(PhD Candidate, Università degli Studi di Perugia)

Sabine Kastner 
(PhD Candidate, TU Graz,  www.sabinekastner.com)




Fig. 8 Page spreads from Thinking Design - Blueprint for an Architecture of Typology

Counterintuitive Typologies
Research Group

Associate Professor
Dr. Andreas Lechner

TU Graz / Faculty of Architecture
Institute of Design & Building Typology
Lessingstrasse 25/IV
A-8010 Graz, Austria

T   +43 316 873 6298
CounterintuitiveTypologies.com 
E   maike.gold@tugraz.at 

︎︎︎Instagram @counterintuitive_typologies

︎︎︎Graz University of Technology

TU Graz


Funded by
︎︎︎FFG – Austrian Research Promotion Agency

FFG


www.AndreasLechner.at
Last update: 27/08/202
Copyright

The information provided by the individual institutes and other facilities of Graz University of Technology as well as the other information providers is compiled independently by them, and entered into the system.  
© Copyright unless otherwise indicated of Andreas Lechner or the authors or of Graz University of Technology

Privacy Statement
(Datenschutzerklärung)

For more information on privacy,
please see ︎︎︎http://datenschutz.tugraz.at

Liability

The entire content of the Counterintuitive Typologies website has been compiled with the greatest care and to the best of our knowledge. However, we can assume no liability for the actuality, completeness and correctness of all the web pages. Content shall be removed immediately from the time that knowledge of a specific infringement of rights is obtained; TU Graz shall not be held liable before this time.

The CBT website contains links to the websites of third parties; TU Graz has no influence over the content of such websites and shall therefore assume no liability for them.
The relevant information provider of the website shall be held responsible for the content and correctness of this information. When the link to the website of the third party was inserted, no infringements of rights were discernible. If TU Graz is made aware of an infringement of rights, the relevant link shall be removed immediately.

The content and works published on this website are subject to copyright. Any kind of reproduction, editing, dissemination and any kind of use beyond the limits of the copyright shall require the prior written consent of the relevant author.

When a user visits a website of TU Graz, information about his/her access (for example, the date, time, page accessed) can be stored. This does not constitute any analysis of personal data (e.g. name, address or email address). If personal data is collected, this is done so with the prior consent of the website user. Any transmission of the data to third parties shall not take place without the user’s express consent.

TU Graz states explicitly that the transmission of data on the Internet (e.g. by email) can pose security risks. Complete data protection against access by third parties cannot be guaranteed. TU Graz shall assume no liability for any damage incurred as a consequence of such security risks. The use of published contact details by third parties for the purpose of advertising is explicitly prohibited. TU Graz reserves the right to take legal action in the event that unsolicited advertising information is sent (e.g. in the form of spam emails).